Feature flags & rollouts · Audit
Feature Flags Rollout Audit
Audit one feature flag, rollout control, experiment gate, kill switch, environment flag, or gradual-release boundary for consistency, safety, ownership, and cleanup.
MCP library 1.6.1 · Instruction library 1.6.1 · English technical instructions
← Back to searchUse this workflow
Connect Vibe Coding Library to a coding agent that supports MCP over Streamable HTTP. Choose Other / MCP agent for a neutral prompt, or a ready-made Codex or Claude Code invocation. Add your task details below.
Goal and scope
Audit one feature flag, rollout control, experiment gate, kill switch, environment flag, or gradual-release boundary for consistency, safety, ownership, and cleanup.
Domain invariants
- Flag owner, default, environment behavior, target audience, dependencies, and removal plan are explicit.
- Backend enforcement, UI visibility, analytics, docs, tests, and rollout gates agree.
- Off state and rollback/kill-switch behavior are safe and tested for the selected feature.
- Stale flags, conflicting experiments, and environment drift do not create unreachable or unsafe behavior.
- Sensitive or paid features are not unlocked by client-only flags.
Audit method
Trace the selected flag from definition/config/provider through server checks, client checks, API behavior, jobs, analytics, tests, deployment, docs, and cleanup references.
Select a targeted and untargeted principal plus the actual default/degraded-provider policy. Follow evaluation identity into feature effects and the point where exposure is emitted. Inspect state created while enabled and what old/off consumers do with it. Pass the failed context/evaluation/transition and expected behavior to Improve Feature Flags Rollout rather than assuming that flipping the boolean alone restores safety.
Workflow ID: feature-flags-rollout-audit · View the versioned source · Shared workflow and authority rules