Security & privacy · Improve
Improve Privacy Data Rights
Fix the selected privacy/data-rights boundary across collection, storage, derived data, external providers, user/admin controls, tests, and documentation when directly affected.
MCP library 1.6.1 · Instruction library 1.6.1 · English technical instructions
← Back to searchUse this workflow
Connect Vibe Coding Library to a coding agent that supports MCP over Streamable HTTP. Choose Other / MCP agent for a neutral prompt, or a ready-made Codex or Claude Code invocation. Add your task details below.
Goal
Fix the selected privacy/data-rights boundary across collection, storage, derived data, external providers, user/admin controls, tests, and documentation when directly affected.
Scope selection
Use the selected data field, consent setting, deletion/export flow, retention job, audit finding, failing test, or explicit privacy bug. Stop for missing legal/product decisions instead of inventing policy.
Change targets
- Data collection/validation, storage schemas, access controls, retention/deletion/export jobs, and derived stores.
- Provider adapters and webhooks that receive or delete the selected data.
- Logs/traces/analytics/error reports that may expose sensitive payloads.
- User/admin UI, copy, privacy settings, and operational docs when they implement the same boundary.
- Tests/fixtures proving primary and derived behavior.
Implementation principles
- Minimize data exposure and preserve necessary compatibility.
- Do not claim legal compliance; implement repository-visible behavior and state remaining gates.
- Avoid broad data migrations unless the selected fix requires a safe migration/forward-fix plan.
- Keep maps/docs synchronized when used.
Validation
Run targeted tests and safe scenarios for collection, consent/opt-out, export/deletion/retention, derived stores, logs, and provider behavior relevant to the selected boundary. Report unavailable managed-provider or backup checks as gates.
Correct the owning collector, access/retention rule, export/delete transaction or provider adapter using distinguishable synthetic subject data. Replay the original lifecycle and inspect primary, derived and provider/log output according to the accepted policy. Feed that evidence into the data-rights check; unresolved policy or provider behavior stays a gate. Finish Patch Checking after supported acceptance, without turning technical tests into a legal-compliance claim.
Workflow ID: privacy-data-rights-polish · View the versioned source · Shared workflow and authority rules