Product & UX · Improve
Improve UX Flow
Improve the selected user/admin journey from entry to completion. The diff should close the actual flow gap across navigation, state, copy, permissions, validation, and feedback rather than polishing isolated UI fragments.
MCP library 1.6.1 · Instruction library 1.6.1 · English technical instructions
← Back to searchUse this workflow
Connect Vibe Coding Library to a coding agent that supports MCP over Streamable HTTP. Choose Other / MCP agent for a neutral prompt, or a ready-made Codex or Claude Code invocation. Add your task details below.
Goal
Improve the selected user/admin journey from entry to completion. The diff should close the actual flow gap across navigation, state, copy, permissions, validation, and feedback rather than polishing isolated UI fragments.
Scope selection
- If the user named a flow, route sequence, funnel step, role, plan state, or task-completion issue, improve that journey and directly affected states.
- If the request is broad, inspect primary flows and apply the highest-confidence improvement with meaningful completion, safety, or conversion impact.
- Include related UI/copy/a11y/state/test fixes when they belong to the same journey.
- Avoid unrelated visual redesigns, backend contract changes, dependency changes, and feature expansion unless the flow fix requires them.
Change targets
- Entry points, navigation, breadcrumbs, redirects, step order, progress, completion/next-step states, and recovery paths.
- Forms, validation timing, disabled/submit/pending states, destructive confirmations, empty/error/partial-success/retry states, and toasts/alerts.
- Permission/plan/tenant/workspace context, visible vs allowed actions, upgrade/no-access/over-quota copy, and safe diagnostics.
- Accessibility for the journey: focus order, keyboard reachability, status announcements, semantic structure, accessible names.
- Directly affected tests, snapshots, analytics hooks, docs, and localization catalogs when the repo uses them.
Implementation principles
- Keep visible promises aligned with backend behavior and product contracts.
- Prefer the owner layer for shared flow state or permission logic rather than local UI workarounds.
- Preserve unrelated behavior and routes.
Validation
Run relevant repository-native checks. For UI changes, use preview/screenshot tooling when available; otherwise state the limitation. Report the changed outcome and the journey states actually checked.
Repair the selected navigation/state/permission owner and directly affected copy/controls. Replay entry → action → persisted result → completion or recovery using the same actor/context, including the failed branch and a normal control. Verify that moving a dead end has not merely relocated it to the next step. Recheck failed transitions and finish the accepted journey patch through Patch Checking.
Workflow ID: ux-flow-polish · View the versioned source · Shared workflow and authority rules